Atlanta Braves Message Board Forum and Blog Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

 Moderated by: Admin
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Javier Vazquez's Potential  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Thu Mar 26th, 2009 12:46 pm
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Double B
Administrator
 

Joined: Sun Mar 15th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Have a feeling Javier Vazquez may be a helluva pitcher for the Braves.  He gave up a lot of homeruns in that White Sox band box but at the Ted he won't have to worry about that.  Plus, players that come to the National from the American League tend to give up about a run a game or more less.

What say you?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Thu Mar 26th, 2009 06:46 pm
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
selwonk
Member
 

Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Apparently Vazquez was one of the unluckiest pitchers last year, posting an unusually high BABIP (Batting Average of Balls In Play) of .328 and a FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching ERA) of 3.74, considerably lower than his actual ERA of 4.67. Also, moving to Turner and the NL alone should give him a considerable boost. Computer projection systems have him posting ERAs between 3.26 (CHONE) and 4.19 (Marcel). He should be a solid #2 starter.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 02:30 pm
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
gt_thwg
Member
 

Joined: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 3
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
When you put baserunners on, it's not all bad luck. I think Vazquez will be much better for the Braves than he was for the Chi Sox, but he's no ace. If you're going to allow as many baserunners as he does, you have to be able to induce groundballs...Vazquez has always given up a lot of fly balls. There is not a chance in hell that he puts up a 3.26 ERA...He MIGHT be under 4.00 ERA if he's able to keep the ball down.

The bigger issue I had with the trade for Vazquez was the fact that we gave up Tyler Flowers to get him. IF we're going to give up a power hitting Catcher, we ought to be getting a little more in return, IMO. I think it was a bit of a knee jerk reaction to the fear of not being able to land a SP.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 05:56 pm
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
selwonk
Member
 

Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I agree with what you're saying about him being a flyball pitcher; however, his BABIP was significantly higher last year than his career average (.310), suggesting that he DID have some bad luck considering his flyball rate has remained constant. Also, Vazquez offsets a little bit of that flyball rate by striking out a good number of batters, by inducing a lot of popups (over 12% of his flyballs are in the infield), and by consistently posting low walk rates. Anyway, I agree that there's very little chance he puts up a 3.26, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if he posts a sub-4.00 ERA. In fact, I think a 3.70 ERA is a reasonable expectation.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Apr 3rd, 2009 06:10 pm
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
selwonk
Member
 

Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
gt_thwg wrote: The bigger issue I had with the trade for Vazquez was the fact that we gave up Tyler Flowers to get him. IF we're going to give up a power hitting Catcher, we ought to be getting a little more in return, IMO. I think it was a bit of a knee jerk reaction to the fear of not being able to land a SP.
Once again, I agree with what you say here, but keep in mind that Flowers was only in Hi-A last year and that he might not be able to stay at catcher. He would still be a good prospect at 1B, though.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Apr 4th, 2009 01:58 am
  PM Quote Reply
6th Post
Confederatebuzz
Member
 

Joined: Fri Mar 20th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 3
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
He has a chance to be a solid pitcher......he chews up innings, and gets a lot of K's. Being in a much bigger stadium while pitching in a league where 8-6 isn't the norm should be a boon as well. He's well suited for #3. The problem is, this team doesn't have a No 1. Instead, he, Lowe, Kawakami and Jurrjens all seem to be somewhere between a 2 and a 3.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Apr 10th, 2009 10:58 pm
  PM Quote Reply
7th Post
JacketFanForLife
Member


Joined: Fri Apr 10th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 4
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
13 wins - 10 losses era around 3.80 - 4.00 very average at best.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed May 13th, 2009 02:18 pm
  PM Quote Reply
8th Post
mack
Member
 

Joined: Thu Mar 19th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
JacketFanForLife wrote: 13 wins - 10 losses era around 3.80 - 4.00 very average at best.
After watching the pen last night,I would take a season of 13 and 10 ! We sure need a closer and quickly.WE are getttttting good pitching but woeful pen work at times.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon May 18th, 2009 02:31 am
  PM Quote Reply
9th Post
Double B
Administrator
 

Joined: Sun Mar 15th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
JacketFanForLife wrote: 13 wins - 10 losses era around 3.80 - 4.00 very average at best.
That's American League numbers, tho.  He'll do a lot better in the junior circuit.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 10:34 am  
Atlanta Braves Message Board Forum and Blog > Baseball > Atlanta Braves > Javier Vazquez's Potential Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.2040 seconds (5% database + 95% PHP). 29 queries executed.